As we gear up for another warm-weather season
in the Park, we will also be saying goodbye to an old friend. The Park
brochure and map that has been in circulation, with minor edits and
corrections, for as long as most of us can remember, is being sent into
well-earned retirement. The brochure that replaces it is the culmination of
almost two years’ work, much of it by Chris Szeglin, our Assistant
Superintendent and a licensed civil engineer. Chris created
a new map, from top to bottom,
which is the heart of the new brochure. The staff of the
Kearney House supervised the
layout and content of the brochure.
Attentive visitors will
notice similarities between the old map and the new, and for good reason.
There were things about the old map that seemed worth saving. It was
intuitive, for one thing, the cliffs given a graphic representation that read
from south to north. It “looked” and “felt” like the Park. Chris has brought
that sensibility to the new map—it still looks and feels like
the Park. At the same time, however, the old map took many more liberties with
scale than we liked. It was, even with a rule of miles running down its
side, more drawing-like than map-like. It was also, relative to the
twelve-mile length of the NJ Section, quite small, the whole of it fitting on
a 17-inch-long sheet of paper with room to spare.
Early on, we made some
decisions about how the new map—and the brochure of which it was to be a
part—would be laid out. We liked the 11x17 inch sheet of the old brochure,
which was folded in half lengthwise and then in thirds along its width to
create, in essence, twelve panels, six on each side. We would keep that basic
shape and size, but we’d make some changes in how we used those spaces. On the
old brochure, the map occupied four of the twelve panels; the cover occupied
one panel; and there was a blank panel with only our return address (in case
the brochure was placed in the mail). Text occupied the remaining six
panels—half of the brochure. We saw the map, on the other hand, as the most
important part of the brochure—what people were really after when they pulled
one from a display rack—and so we would double its size. The map would occupy
eight panels, four on each side of the brochure. The map would be split
in two, then, with the Huyler’s Landing area, the midway point of the Park,
shown on both sides, providing some overlap (so hikers would have only
to flip the map over twice on any given loop). The larger size would allow us
to include such important details as the colors of the blazes for the
different trails. It would also permit us to include place names and names of
natural features that could not be fit on the older map, as well as to call
out significant places and landmarks across the river from the Park.
The cover would still
get its own panel, but we’d discard the blank panel for mailing (we could use
an envelope, after all). That still left a mere three panels for text—half the
space the previous brochure had had. We would have to reduce the text to bare
bones, then: One panel, we decided, would contain a general description of the
Park; another would contain information about our various facilities; the
third would contain hiking information and advice. (Of course, when the old
brochure was first printed, there had been no such thing as the Internet;
today’s visitors can find most of what was in the old brochure—and then
some—at our website.)
Our layout hashed out,
Chris dove into the painstaking task of building the new map. From
New Jersey’s website, Chris downloaded “orthophoto tiles”
made from aerial flyovers conducted in 2002. Using AutoCAD software, he then
traced the centerlines of roads, the shoreline and cliff face, and other
significant features. This resulted in a highly accurate map, which he could
in turn scale within the 32-inch north–south space allotted for it using the
same scale as
USGS maps, where one inch equals 2,000 feet. The east–west
scale, however, he decided from the start, would have to be exaggerated. It is
a Palisades issue that has long confronted mapmakers: the Park is twelve miles
long, but only half a mile wide—at its widest. Details such as roads and
trails tend to get crammed together, especially along the base of the cliffs,
where the land is more often a few hundred feet wide (including the
steep talus slope), and nowhere near 2,000 feet (in other words, there would
be considerably less than an inch of map space, using the north–south scale).
Chris therefore doubled the east–west scale, so one inch equaled 1,000 feet.
(As with any mapmaking venture, where three dimensions are rendered in two,
other distortions were necessary, as well: roads on the new map, for example,
are much “wider” on paper than in real life.)
A graphic representation
of the cliffs was favored over
topographic contour lines, which besides being
unfamiliar to many casual hikers and other Park visitors, become hopelessly
crammed together when trying to depict the abrupt drop of several hundred feet
created by the cliffs. Here Chris tried to stay true not only to the “old” map
and its pictorial representation of the cliff face, but to an even older one,
a beautiful hand-drawn sketch map of the Park made by Robert L. Dickinson for
the American Geographical Society of New York in 1921. (See "Palisades
Lit. 101" for more on Dickinson's work.) For the Web, Chris
broke the map into
three letter-sized sections, removing its shading to make it easier
on home printers.
While our brochure
cannot compete with Dickinson’s artistry (even if, at the same time, our map
is “cleaner” than his, drawn with advanced computer software rather than a
fountain pen), we hope we have at least brought to it an echo of the
sensibility he shared when presenting his work. “The charts of the amateur
mapman,” he wrote more than eighty years ago, “try to hark back to the time
when the high tide of art in cartography swept around the world, when maps
were not abstractions but pictures—the same type that the eye of the airplane
is bringing back to us again—picture maps which, when made for use in this
locality, show our shore as though we imagined ourselves flying along the
edge over the river. … to lure us aloft…”
The new brochure is not
perfect. We’re certain we’ll have some changes to make the next time it goes
to the printer. Still—may our visitors enjoy using it as much as we
enjoyed creating it.